Search for: "Long v. Superior Court"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
Superior Court is a mass action brought by more than 600 plaintiffs in a California state court. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
Superior Court is a mass action brought by more than 600 plaintiffs in a California state court. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Then enter the US Supreme Court, with its 2010 decision in Perdue v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Piper of the Land Court has added his voice to the chorus of opinions on the important issue presented in the case of Eaton v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am
Superior Court ex rel Herrera, A160200 (Cal. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
Contract provisions agreed upon in the course of collective negotiations pursuant to the Taylor Law cannot not override a statutory mandateMatter of City of Long Beach v Civil Serv. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal.4th 969, Ms. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:35 pm
This was recently illustrated in an Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Kelava v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:56 pm
Novo Nordisk v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:59 am
The California Supreme court finally handed down some rules in 2012, in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
DeAngelo appealed the decision of the Municipal Court to the Law Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:04 am
The two-part framework announced by the Court in Alice was adapted from one of the Court’s earlier Section 101 cases, Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:40 am
This comes in the wake of the 2015 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Carter v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
In Mellouli v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 4:39 am
Hart v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:05 am
The Appellate Division remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further action.* Case law holds that such supplements are to be adjusted to reflect salary increases that the disabled retired firefighter would have otherwise been paid had he or she remained on active duty.** In addition to "mandamus" and "certiorari," CPLR Article 78 provides for the modern version of two other "ancient writs:" the writ of quo warranto [by what authority] and the writ of… [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Superior Court (“Powerine I”) 24 Cal.4th 945. [read post]