Search for: "MAJORS v. MAJORS"
Results 981 - 1000
of 62,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am
It seems that Munich has currently provided for the highest levels of penalty payment in its orders for inter partes PIs, of €250,000 per infringement in 10x Genomics v Nanostring, Dyson v SharkNinja and MyStromer v Revolt (ex parte), with other local divisions providing for slightly more modest sums of €100,000 per day in 10x Genomics v Curio (Dusseldorf), €10,000 per product up to €30,000 per day in Ortovox v Mammut… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:53 am
On June 13, the Supreme Court decided Vidal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:33 am
Salinas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Divided into four parts, the collection opens with a foreword by Justice Russell Brown (as he then was), one of the judges who wrote the majority decision in the 2021 constitutional law case involving the City of Toronto, discussed below. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am
Writing for the majority at Ontario’s Divisional Court, she said the arbitrator’s decision was reasonable. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:47 pm
It is not the Supreme Court's job to conduct a general prospective oversight of the executive branch.The post Two Excellent Opinions in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm
A good faith disagreement exists between the majority in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:57 pm
v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:30 pm
U.S. on its website and revealed that a majority has voted to dismiss Idaho's appeal to reinstate its abortion law as "improvidently granted. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)In today's ruling in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Indeed, the majority opinion doesn’t contain a single mention of last month’s NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
" Gross v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm
In March, in Lindke v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Although the majority did not publish an opinion explaining its decision, one likely explanation is that the majority felt that the case presented nothing new to address in the light of its past Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, and especially Bucklew v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:29 am
Delman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
In the past, of course, the agencies have stated that “the vast majority of mergers are either procompetitive and enhance consumer welfare or are competitively benign”[5] and that “[m]ergers are one means by which firms can improve their ability to compete. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
Both the immediate stakes and the lineup in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:52 am
Synder v. [read post]
