Search for: "MDL Panel"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 8:33 am
In response to the growing number of lawsuits against Xarelto manufacturer Janssen Pharmaceuticals, some of the thousands of lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:39 am
For example, the thousands of cases currently pending in an MDL in South Carolina relate to the use of PFAS in firefighting foam, thus resulting in groundwater contamination. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:49 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consider the plaintiffs' request. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
The MDL Panel, for example, may decide to consolidate a set of cases in a jurisdiction that previously had nothing to do with the litigation -- like sending Breast Implants to Alabama or Albuterol to Wyoming -- and all of a sudden an unanticipated body of local appellate law governs your federal issues, and your cases are either won or lost for reasons beyond your control. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 11:24 am
Taxotere is consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2740). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
The defense filed a Motion to Stay on March 20th that specifically requested the Court to stop all litigation and wait for the MDL Panel to rule on what venue would be taken. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, MDL-1507 (E.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:58 pm
In Sept. 2011, the FDA’s Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel recommended that surgical mesh for transvaginal POP be reclassified from class II to class III and require PMAs. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:44 am
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) granted Plaintiffs’ request for the creation of a MDL concerning lawsuits alleging a link between the use of the power morcellators and the spread of cancer, to the District of Kansas. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:01 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) approved a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) for the Zofran heart defects, cleft palate, and cleft lip cases. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:55 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation entered a Transfer Order, creating MDL 3060: In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:19 pm
On one hand, as one panelist pointed out, the management of class and individual actions in a single MDL raises different challenges than the management of mass tort cases in an MDL. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied the plaintiffs request to consolidate the Reglan litigation during pretrial proceedings in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied the plaintiffs request to consolidate the Reglan litigation during pretrial proceedings in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied the plaintiffs request to consolidate the Reglan litigation during pretrial proceedings in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:43 pm
Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2151. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:43 pm
Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2151. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:15 am
They include: • geographic dispersement of parties; • consolidation by the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation of federal litigation over the three drugs in the Southern District of Illinois; • risk of redundancy and inconsistent filings by different judges, resulting in undue delay and expense; • existence of common issues of law and fact, as found by the MDL panel; and •… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:08 pm
One case was removed to federal court and ultimately transferred to a federal court in Minnesota pursuant to the order of an MDL panel. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
The Third Circuit panel does an exceptional job summarizing this unwieldy body of extra-textual precedent on pages 32-42 of the opinion (for § 1 antitrust claims) and 153-172 (for RICO enterprises); any associates or clerks trying to figure out these complex fields could do worse than to review them. [read post]
