Search for: "Marriage of Smith" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2009, 8:08 am
Lamar Smith, the committee's ranking Republican member, are getting the congressional impeachment process started today. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:25 pm
Todd Smith, author of the recently-launched Texas Appellate Law Blog, offered up an interesting piece yesterday on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hall Street Associates LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Smith — Again” [Joseph Davis, Becket/Federalist Society on certiorari petition in Ricks v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Might the Court's decision give rise to same sex marriage or universal health care as federal "privileges or immunities? [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 11:49 pm
Louis visiting at Wash.U), Catherine Smith (Denver), and I worked together to bring as many scholars from the first workshop to CRT 20. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:31 am
Berkeley School of Law's Death Penalty Clinic, guest blogging at the American Constitution Society's ACS BlogTwo of our bloggers were also chiming in on Tricia Walsh-Smith's poorly planned YouTube video, in which she provides all sorts of intimate marriage details online for the whole world to see: Details of a divorce in YouTube video - New York lawyer Daniel E. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:19 am
"February - Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly gives a speech promoting family mediation.March - In a further cost-cutting measure, the Government abolishes legal aid for everything except MPs charged with fraudulently claiming expenses.April - The royal marriage is delayed after Prince William forgets to sign the pre-nuptial agreement. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Cooper, the lead attorney for the anti-marriage proponents of Proposition 8. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by jonathanturley
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 877 (1990), and to “communicat[e]” those teachings to others, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
" If the state made Smith create a website for a gay marriage—just because she was willing to create one for a straight marriage—that would be compelled speech, which would violate her First Amendment rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am by Sasha Volokh
" If the state made Smith create a website for a gay marriage—just because she was willing to create one for a straight marriage—that would be compelled speech, which would violate her First Amendment rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 12:23 pm by Sasha Volokh
" If the state made Smith create a website for a gay marriage—just because she was willing to create one for a straight marriage—that would be compelled speech, which would violate her First Amendment rights. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 2:41 pm by Guest Blogger
People in this country have every right to personally disapprove of my marriage. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:21 pm
Organized by Oxford Programme in Asian Laws, and convened by Ngoc Son Bui, Ewan Smith the Workshop on Political Parties and Constitutions in Asia proposes to consider the "relationship of political parties to constitutions has received inadequate attention in Asian comparative constitutional studies [and to ] encourage and provide a forum for scholarship on the role of political parties in constitutional design and practice. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
United States, without considering what features of the broader constitutional universe explain the increasing constitutional success of the movement for same-sex marriage. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mark Graber
Smith (1990), and mandating exemptions when, as appears to be the case in Washington, no strong reason exists for not giving religious pharmacists an exemption from the stocking and delivery rules. [read post]
14 May 2022, 6:00 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he [Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act] provides that the guidelines must be followed ‘unless the court makes a finding that the application of the guidelines would be inappropriate. [read post]