Search for: "Martin v. United States"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:29 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in the famous case of Martin v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Malom Group AG, Martin U. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
The majority held in the Dred Scott case that a slave was not a citizen of the United States and therefore did not have the requisite status to be a part of a suit in federal court. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
But it is a choice the people of Alabama have made, and nothing [in] the Constitution of the United States forbids it. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
United States The New York Office of the Attorney General has announced the results of an investigation into “credential stuffing,” which uncovered 1.1 million compromised accounts from cyberattacks on 17 well-known companies. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Having passed both chambers, the Maryland False Health Claims Act of 2010 (“MFHCA”) has just been signed by Governor Martin O’Malley and will be effective October 1, 2010. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Martin, 2019 WL 2896444 (6th Cir. 2019); United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:12 am
In Martins Beach v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:37 pm
Congratulations to Martin E. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm
The government will have another opportunity to prove the amount of loss.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/08/07/14-30034.pdf United States v. [read post]
