Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,912
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
Merpel disagrees: it's not possible to separate law from policy on a matter as sensitive as this, she mewses.Some further readingEleonora's katpost of 17 April on the Supreme Court's decision to refer questions to the CJEU here Katpost reporting on the Baker & McKenziie debate on whether this case represents the end of browsing as we know it here Lionel Bently's assault on the Court of Appeal decision in this case, hosted on this weblog here Simon Clark's explanation of… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Maxzone Auto Parts (Canada) Corp.) ____________________ “Competition matters. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
Clark (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1409, 1420 [the death of an important witness may constitute prejudice]; Stafford v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
This is sometimes called an evaluation of the facts and is often a matter of degree upon which different judges can legitimately differ. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
Do They Matter? [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:30 am
Clarke, 965 F.2d 1077, 1080 (D.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
As a legal matter, I can't say that Judge Gould is wrong to say that's permissible.But I did come away from the opinion with a keen sense that these things matter. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:03 am
Justice O'Connor regrets Bush v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm
Five days ago, the UK Supreme Court pronouced its ruling on Public Relations Consultants Association Limited v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm
The uncertainty produced by the amendment to clause 6 is a matter of concern. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
Within a matter of days, Segal’s petition had over 250,000 signatures, and had garnered national attention. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:26 am
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Does it matter if it’s an attack on the economy, where there’s little physical damage, there’s just disruption? [read post]
