Search for: "Matter of Martin B."
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
B. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
§ 2422(b). [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:12 pm
"And the New America Foundation makes the key point: "It is important to bear in mind that "sufficient protection" from harmful interference is not a simple technical matter but a complex question of weighing potential benefits, risks and user expectations. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
§ 1054(b)(1)(H)(i), an anti-age-discrimination provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Well, in addition to the usual causation and adequacy as a matter of law defenses, there's a special legal doctrine that's been crafted to deal with precisely this situation. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:16 am
Specifically, in Matter of Martin B., Manhattan Surrogate Renee Roth had to decide whether the “issue” and “descendants” provided for in seven 1969 trusts includes children conceived with the cryopreserved semen of the grantor’s late son — James B., as he is known in court papers — whose death preceded his own sons’ conception. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:15 am
Kelly NEW YORK COUNTY Trusts and Estates Children Conceived by In Vitro Found Grantor's 'Issue'; Trusts' Intent Includes Bloodline Members Matter of Martin B. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:59 am
Specifically, in Matter of Martin B., Manhattan Surrogate Renee Roth had to decide whether the "issue" and "descendants" provided for in seven 1969 trusts includes children conceived with the cryopreserved semen of the grantor's late son -- James B., as he is known in court papers -- whose death preceded his own sons' conception. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Neah Martin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
§310.200(b). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Zywicki & Anthony B. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 1:12 pm
” Martin George does not think he is lucky to be poked by Charon on Facebook - and now that I know what ‘poking on Facebook’ means, I can well understand his concern. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Zywicki & Anthony B. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:24 am
(I don't know what that subdivision (b) means; there doesn't seem to be a 606(b) equivalent somewhere else in the rules that it might refer to, and I didn't look at case law. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:51 pm
Steven B. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:51 pm
Steven B. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
As an initial matter, we note that all speech covered by the FCC’s indecency policy is fully protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
