Search for: "Matter of Price v Evers" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
The previous posts are the Introduction, Part I,Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V.] [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Now we’re looking at average prices of 14 cents. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
This changed with the rise of large daily newspapers in the mid-1800s and then broadcast radio and television in the early half of the 20th century.[5] Media providers were able to cross-subsidize news production independent of private or political patronage thanks to three things: (1) high-speed printing presses or broadcast facilities, (2) geographic-based market and pricing power, and (3) the widespread advertising base that was made possible by (1) and (2). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm by Donald Clarke
It’s like saying that the Supreme Court could have avoided ruling on the constitutionality of segregation by simply declining to hear Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Whose sense of decency or propriety matters? [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am by Frank Pasquale
Jerome Barron, the author of the 1967 article that provided key support to the Red Lion decision, was right to reaffirm in 2007 that access rights remain as relevant (and as constitutional) as ever. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
., we build roads (a public good) but with Davis-Bacon wages: you can put a price tag on the surplus. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” (November 9, 2017, speaking at an SEC Conference); “I believe every ICO I have ever seen is a security . . . [read post]