Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Probably Russia or China would be delighted to loan President Trump a few billion, but it might not be so good for the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Eric J. Miller
In Hudson, Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, insisted that: we now have increasing evidence that police forces across the United States take the constitutional rights of citizens seriously. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by David Cheifetz
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 2016 EWHC 2768 (Admin) see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2016/2768.pdf A spokesperson from the Crown – or UK gov’t – or the Tory party, pick your poison, announced, as one might expect, that the decision will be appealed. [read post]