Search for: "Mitchell, Appeal of" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
"The Appeals Court ruling was based on an e-mail exchange between Basis and Amazon during mid-trial at the lower court (Basis Technology Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Of course, Beth Mitchell and the lawyers at Disability Rights Texas did all the work, and the situation is so messed up that surely litigation was inevitable, anyway. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by NL
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm
Mitchell, 652 F.3d 387 (CA3 2011), cert. denied, 566 U.S. ___ (2012); Haskell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:00 pm
To discuss this and other probate questions, call Mitchell A. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by NL
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:59 pm by carie
Marin County Superior Court Judge Lynn O'Malley Taylor struck down that rewrite as illegal because the state failed to seek public comment as required by the Administrative Procedures Act.Corrections officials have spent the last two years tinkering with the procedures to incorporate small changes suggested in some of the more than 20,000 public comments.Sims, charged with killing Domino's deliveryman John Harrington as part of a cross-country rampage against the pizza company that once… [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:04 am by Minnesota Law Review
Ted Sampsell-Jones (William Mitchell College of Law) replies to Professors Cribari and Judges’s article, Speaking of Silence: A Reply to “Making Defendants Speak“. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied 11 NY3d 737; People v Rogers, 111 AD2d 665, lv denied 66 NY2d… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by NL
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:14 pm by CPLEAadmin
Court of Appeal Rules on One Man’s Bowel Movements and Charter Rights Employment LawPeter Bowal and Roger FerneyhoughCumulative Cause: Part 2 Environmental LawJeff SurteesWho’s the Boss? [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 The decision on permission to appeal is at [2014] HKCFI 1947). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:04 am by Steve Hall
Department spokesman Jeffrey Callison said no decision has been made yet on whether to appeal. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:51 am by Steve Hall
Mississippi consistently has appointed unqualified, underfunded and overburdened attorneys to represent death row inmates in their appeals, a petition filed Monday with the state Supreme Court says.The brief was filed on behalf of 15 death row inmates challenging the systemwide failure to provide them with competent counsel during their appeals after conviction.The death row inmates are: Steve Knox, Michelle Byrom, Blayde Grayson, Benny Joe Stevens, Jan Michael Brawner, Rodney… [read post]