Search for: "Montana Supreme Court" Results 981 - 1000 of 3,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 11:04 am by Amy Howe
Christian: Issues arising from the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling that landowners can bring claims under state law to require companies to pay to clean up hazardous-waste sites even though the companies are already working with the federal Environmental Protection Agency to remediate the sites. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 11:49 am by Dean Freeman
Plaintiff Demands Total Damages be Covered in Overlapping Policies  In the case recently before the Montana Supreme Court, it’s worth noting that Montana is a fault state, meaning there is no PIP coverage requirement. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Jonathan Spontarelli
Is Still the Wild West of Election Advertising” by Frances Bula for The Globe and Mail Montana: “State Auditor Rosendale Dropped Fines Against Top Campaign Donor” by John Adams (Montana Free Press) for Missoula Current Ethics National: “Justice Department Issues Indictment for 2013 Congressional Trip to Azerbaijan” by Katharine Tully-McManus for Roll Call Missouri: “Clean Missouri Will Be on November Ballot After High Court Refuses to… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:46 pm
  Given these facts, rather than speculate, it makes sense to ask the Washington Supreme Court directly.For whatever it's worth, on the merits, I think that the EEOC (and Montana Supreme Court) take the right approach. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
  However, the Supreme Court sided with Rogers, saying that the ISP was entitled to reasonable payment for the effort needed to compile the information. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 4:31 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Montana Supreme Court exercised supervisory control in a matter in which it is alleged that Montana State University - Bozeman negligently hired and failed to protect a student from a predatory professor. we find that exercise of supervisory control... [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 8:36 am by Kate Fort
We are wrapping up a training in Montana where every person in the room answered the ICWA pop quiz question: “Do ICWA protections apply to non-Native parents of Indian children? [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Greg Lukianoff
The biggest problem is that the blueprint definition doesn't track the Supreme Court's standard for harassment in this context — that the conduct be "so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive... that the victim-students are effectively denied equal access to an institution's resources and opportunities. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 10:11 am by Kate Fort
The Montana Supreme Court continues to apply Baby Girl to absent fathers involved in state initiated proceedings, and not apply ICWA when terminating their rights. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:01 am by Eugene Volokh
”Yesterday, the Arizona Supreme Court announced that it was rejecting the proposal; for more on why I think that's right, see this post. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:02 pm by John Wright
It is likely to become a Supreme Court issue if the State of Hawaii decides to appeal. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court to overrule a 2017 lower-court ruling that upheld Montana’s limits on campaign contributions for state candidates. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm by Craig Swanson
Supreme Court to strike down Montana’s contribution limits, arguing they are an unconstitutional limit on free speech. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 9:16 pm by Jim Sedor
Prosecutor Won’t File Charges by Jason Hancock for Kansas City Star Montana: Montana’s Campaign-Contribution Limits Appealed to U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Beth Baker is on the Montana Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:12 am by ilpc
No documentation or testimony of an authorized tribal representative either dispelled or confirmed the District Court’s and Department’s belief that the children were not Indian children as defined by ICWA. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 1:34 pm
(Montana Supreme Court, July 24, 2018, Associated Management Services, Inc. v. [read post]