Search for: "Mr. X"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2022, 6:55 am
The Board determined the appropriate formula is as follows: [(Variable Compensation earned for the entire week x (44 ÷ (44+OT hours)) ÷44] x 1.5 For example, if an employee is in electronics sales and receives $1,000 in commission compensation for one week, and worked 60 hours that week, the formula would apply as follows: [($1,000 x (44 ÷ 60)) ÷ 44] x 1.5 = $25 The Ontario Labour Relations Board determined this formula allows for… [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:52 pm
' was well chosen and during the opening ceremony even Mr K. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
” The report further notes that because these parties did not challenge the validity of Mr. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:35 pm
Ms Tiensia counterclaimed for the 3 x deposit award on the basis that the deposit was unprotected. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
The result is that if someone "does not show cause why X should not happen" he is conceding that X should happen. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:02 am
X denies that Saddam has WMDs, but Mr. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:40 am
Mr. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Update x 2: Read a summary of the reaction to the cuts here and an analysis of the underlying rational here. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:01 am
Although Mr. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:32 am
“Mr. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 12:41 am
Butler's nomination shows the dominance of liberal ideology in Mr. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:01 pm
Let’s take the case of Mrs X. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 10:05 am
He does not, in marked contrast to Mr Mathieson. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:26 pm
In trying to figure out how Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
Second, Judge Prost argued that Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:42 pm
" And the defendant (Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
I can't take credit for this; it comes from Mr. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 7:04 am
No more Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:50 am
If on specific facts a judge finds that X is the case, then it must be true as a completely general proposition that it is possible for X to be the case. [read post]
