Search for: "Murphy v State" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm by David Oscar Markus
That was Clarence Thomas at the Utah State Bar convention. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:45 pm
While federal district court decisions are not binding on state courts or on the Ninth Circuit, the growing acceptance of the reasoning in White v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am by Dan Ernst
  While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:22 am by Joshua Glazov
In 2000 they came very close when they agreed to hear an appeal from the 11th Circuit's Murphy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Michael Murphy analyzes the oral argument in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Judge Murphy got reversed on a downward departure in Berry v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
That argument was unsuccessful in the state courts, but when Murphy went to federal court, the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]