Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Grant, with the notion that Congress has “broad authority” to regulate campaign speech, Nixon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Am Law Daily] * Former Massachusetts senator Scott Brown has reportedly ditched Nixon Peabody to try his hand at a U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:56 am
  I have no idea how the lead prosecutor was someone whose claim to fame was that as Gerald Ford's Chief Counsel, he was the creator of the Nixon Pardon. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Nixon’s goal of remaking through his appointments a Court of “judicial self restraint”—in the image of Justice Frankfurter. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
Second, he fails to accurately reflect the debate over the historical record of Keynesianism during the Great Depression and in particular the “stagflation” episode of the 1970s, which shattered the Nixon-era consensus on the wisdom of Keynesian economics. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
In its 1993 ruling in Nixon v Blackwell, the Delaware Supreme Court broadly rejected the notion that “there should be any special, judicially-created rules to ‘protect’ minority stockholders of closely-held Delaware corporations” (626 A.2d 1366, 1379). [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
And, Jonathan Yardley reviews Will Swift's Pat and Dick: The Nixons, and Intimate Portrait of a Marriage (Threshold).In addition to his Washington Post piece, David Garrow has also posted on SSRN "Toward a Definitive History of Griggs v. [read post]