Search for: "PRICE v. U.S."
Results 981 - 1000
of 6,736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Given this paucity of U.S. legal tech IPOs, it is notable that 2021 saw three U.S. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Given this paucity of U.S. legal tech IPOs, it is notable that 2021 saw three U.S. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am
Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
In Fiscal Year 2020, the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:55 am
The U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am
Over 25 years ago, the Second Circuit U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:59 am
At the start of this year, Nokia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
That distinction is why the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:24 pm
From yesterday's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm
Allegations related to the healthcare company covertly controlling a distribution network that engaged in questionable pricing practices to boost sales. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
By dichotomizing what are continuous variables, the categorization extracts a significant price in multivariate models used in epidemiology. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:59 pm
In addition, the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:07 pm
FTC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:50 am
Within the last year, the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:50 am
Within the last year, the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm
In the recent case of Ohio v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
After some highly technical parsing of Section 204 of the Trade Act of 1974, the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
; 7:21-cv-10179, Anderson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
; 7:21-cv-10179, Anderson v. [read post]
