Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:30 am
In Tennison Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
§ 1332(a)(2) (granting the district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions between “citizen of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state”). [5] See, e.g., V’Guara Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Vogle v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:28 pm
Lodge No. 5 of the Fraternal Order of Police v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
They might, though serve as a basis for the formulation of public policy and national legislation by the OECD member states. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am
”[v] If SEC or other proposed federal regulation of cybersecurity becomes a reality, implementing the Framework could be a mandatory exercise. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:38 pm
Spansion Inc., 2014 WL 934505 (E.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Police seized a laptop, cell phone, MP3 player, and four external hard drives from Enjaian's apartment. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:50 am
The style of the case is, American Risk Insurance Company, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm
Over Google’s objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:16 am
The appraisal, which was not ordered by Robert until March 5, 2013 — long after the four-month period specified in the agreement — valued the property as of March 11, 2013. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:38 am
Harvard Enter's, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Citing Bicon, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
To request a relief through the streamlined approach, the Delegating CPO and its Designated CPO must meet the following criteria: The Delegating CPO must: (a) delegate all of its investment management authority with respect to the commodity pool to the Designated CPO; (b) not participate in the solicitation of participants for the pool; and, (c) not manage any property of the pool. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
” Bicon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:20 am
Brownington Center Church v. [read post]
