Search for: "Paul Thomas " Results 981 - 1000 of 3,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2009, 10:06 am
"This case deserves our full attention," wrote Justice John Paul Stevens in an opinion joined by Justice Stephen G. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:33 pm by Michael Kraut
The cops said Thomas was apparently high on aerosol gases from 13 whipped cream cans. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:39 pm by David Kravets
The outcome of the other case against Jammie Thomas-Rasset is pending. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Scott Bomboy
Rand Paul's vote at 11:42 a.m. put Gorsuch over the required vote total. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 9:05 am by Bridget Crawford
According to the website, "The symposium, organized by Professor Thomas P. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:04 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Clarence Thomas joined. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:12 am
REV. 965 Three Faces of Deference Paul Horwitz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:20 am by Jim Sedor
Mallory Pleads Guilty to Improperly Accepting, Disclosing Gifts from Lobbyists” by Jim Siegel for Columbus Dispatch Campaign Finance “House Dems Shame Stingy Members” by Mike Lillis for The Hill “Super PACs Keep Candidates Afloat with a Little Help from Their Friends” by Paul Blumenthal for Huffington Post “Finance Laws Aim to Be Clear” by Joy Hampton for Moore American Ethics “Ethics Reforms Shepherded by Bowser Look Better in Hindsight, Some… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:59 pm
  Though they are a minority on the nine-justice court, Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens win as often as they lose.... [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:53 am
Here's what we had on the blog regarding today's opinions and arguments: The Opinions: - Lyle has this commentary on the consequences of today's opinion in the abortion cases; - *NEW: 6:21 PM: The commentary of Bonnie Scott Jones of the Center for Reproductive Rights can be found here; and - *NEW 7:30 PM: Comments from Paul Benjamin Linton of the Thomas More Society are now posted here. - Lyle also has this post (updated as of 3:30 p.m.) summarizing the opinion at… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:07 am
And Justice Scalia issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Clarence Thomas joined. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Bridget Crawford
Elmendorf, UC Davis School of Law Paul A. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
For these reasons, the Apprendi cases have attracted an unusual combination of supporters: conservative originalists Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, and, as of Cunningham, Chief Justice John Roberts; and moderate liberals Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 11:30 am
The Editor-in-Chief for the Search Team is Jason Baron, whom I have written about several times previously, along with Executive Editors, Richard Braman and Kenneth Withers, and Senior Editors, Thomas Allman, James Daley and George Paul. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:17 am by Walter Olson
Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman: yes, the confirmation process had gone wrong, but not necessarily in the way we’re told [National Affairs] A case against judicial restraint [Ilya Shapiro, same, related Cato] “Business and the Roberts Court without Scalia” [Jonathan Adler, related on supposed “pro-business” Court] SCOTUS should (again) step in to reject Obama end-run around advice/consent on appointment power [Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry, Cato] The… [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:41 am
" "Justice Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, and John Paul Stevens joined in the majority; Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]