Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
On appeal to the House of Lords, the charge was upheld but the interest for me lies in LJ Bingham's analysis at para 7 of whta s 127 is for. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
On the retention of DNA and other biometric evidence (S & Marper v UK): “once the Protection of Freedoms Act had come into force in England and Wales, the police would begin removing the profiles of un-convicted people from the National DNA Database. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
ASIL has published an Insight (.pdf) about the recent ICJ decision in Belgium v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Whitehouse v Gay News Limited [1979] AC 617, the matter was debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:28 pm
In the courts Keyu v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
The court examined Lord Woolf’s class of people from whom “higher standards of conduct can rightly be expected by the public”. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
That is one of the issues that Madam Justice Fitzpatrick was asked to decide in Tassone v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Isn't it wrong for me to change my opinion simply because one of the victims stiffed a drug lord? [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda Sutherland… [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
would be Joseph de Maistre; in England, Sir Robert Filmer perhaps Lord Eldon. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:05 am
re v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
re v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
However, judicial office holders who blog (or who post comments on other people’s blogs) must not identify themselves as members of the judiciary. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:36 pm
C v A Local Authority; G v E, 2010; Neary v Hillingdon, 2011 and see CQC and CSCI’s many reports detailing concerns about restraint). [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
Closed societies encounter terrorism too; it seems a sad reality that people will always find a reason to kill innocent people. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
There was no history of people slipping on the steps. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
There was no history of people slipping on the steps. [read post]
