Search for: "People v Person" Results 981 - 1000 of 31,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 3:12 am by Evan M. Levow
In theory, anyone who comes into contact with an intoxicated person could inquire as to whether they intend to drive, but it would be unwieldy and unreasonably to impose criminal liability on all of those people. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:12 pm
The Court of Appeals has held that "[a] defendant may be convicted of depraved indifference murder when but a single person is endangered in only a few rare circumstances" (People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
Does that make us horrible people? [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm by Josh Blackman
" And some Presidential conduct—for example, speaking to and on behalf of the American people, see Trump v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am by SHG
Totally understandable, as you’re allowed to value your personal concerns over those of other people. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
” (And yet, many people in the public eye keep referencing and evangelizing the theory despite its direct and repeated role in killing people). [read post]