Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am
My guess is that in discussions about whether to create a plural executive you’d find the same assumption at work, with people saying that distinctions among those people would have to be made expressly in the Constitution or adopted by the executives themselves. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
On Friday, we will be in court with our co-counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute and the law firm Cooley LLP for oral argument in the case, Wikimedia v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:49 pm
In the opinion for USA v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
In Zervos v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
The more similar a person’s living conditions are to people in the same age group in mainstream society, the less likely it is that the person is deprived of liberty. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
In particular, the legislature was clearly reacting to an ordinance enacted in February by the city of Charlotte, which added “lesbian, gay and transgender” to the list of protected traits for antidiscrimination purposes and provided that transgender people can use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 9:16 am
When I responded that there was no reason to create a new branch of the military, the retort was, "Well, there's no reason not to do so. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Simply put: bank competition affects people’s pocketbooks and their daily lives. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am
Lynch v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
; and Calder v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 3:31 am
(My article on Cooper v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
Constitutional Officers, including the Commonwealth Attorney, are answerable to the people of their county or city, not to any of the three branches coming out of Richmond.As well, the Judiciary is not a completely free, stand alone branch. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
The embassy refused because of a longstanding executive branch policy not to list Israel for people born in Jerusalem. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
As the recent case of Pinero v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
