Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 981 - 1000
of 5,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Bull and McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:32 pm
The Court of Appeals was confronted with this issue today in People v Antwine, 2007 NY Slip Op 05585. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:45 am
” I asked on cross. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:43 am
For example, I had an elderly man (and now some people think that I am an elderly man — ouch!) [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 12:38 pm
Wise v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
A pending Supreme Court, Elonis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:49 am
As it rolled, it crossed into the path of a 2001 Honda CR-V driven by 67-year-old Freddie Lee Smith of Dumfries. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Indeed, the hearing before Warby J was a fully contested trial, which included cross-examination of the Claimant. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Indeed, the hearing before Warby J was a fully contested trial, which included cross-examination of the Claimant. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Indeed, the hearing before Warby J was a fully contested trial, which included cross-examination of the Claimant. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:14 am
If true, these are where things have gotten out of hand, where appropriate challenge crosses the line of a feeding frenzy on the part of weak-minded and dangerous people who, unsatisfied with merely expressing their disapproval, feel some sick need to cause actual damage. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals this week found in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:09 pm
In 1998, the Canadian Supreme Court in Thomson Newspapers Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:53 am
For most people, Halloween is a fun and silly holiday. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:21 am
Tim Cushing does an excellent job of saying what needed to be said about the Third Circuit’s decision in Fenico v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:55 pm
In a recent case, Young v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm
By John Knox, cross-posted from Center for Progressive Reform On February 28, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, a case with far-reaching implications for efforts to hold corporations accountable when they commit or are complicit in abuses of human rights. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
We’re pleased to cross-post a piece by our sister blog, Trading Secrets, regarding California’s peculiar take on employee non-solicitation provisions. [read post]
