Search for: "People v. Fair"
Results 981 - 1000
of 10,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2009, 5:59 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
The complaint (full text) in Winburn v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
The Fall 2024 lineup for the University of Pennsylvania Legal History Workshop is below:September 12th, 2024: Jonathan Gienapp (Stanford University), "The People of the United States: The Lost Constitution of National Popular Sovereignty"September 26th, 2024: Ofra Bloch (Tel Aviv University, Buchmann Faculty of Law), “Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 12:14 pm
” So wrote Justice Felix Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:15 am
In Case of Sekmadienis Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:15 am
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan drew headlines in Vanity Fair and People by weaving Spider-Man references into her opinion in Kimble v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am
Manheim Township School District * More Teenagers Mistakenly Think “Private” Chat Conversations Will Remain Private–People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 5:43 am
In Debeato v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm
But you can overstate the degree of what’s learned v. social. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
He argued for a convention in which the entire founding document is fair game. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
This week, I've blogged on a forthcoming article about the Supreme Court case Tyler v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:16 am
Frye and Hafler v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:53 pm
” Patterson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 am
A recent case, Grainger v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
But that many people "could" be affected doesn't create a public benefit if there's no showing the many people actually are affected. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm
In Osarczuk v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Indeed, it’s the judiciary who have largely sustained this robust (but mostly fair) approach to human rights law in England and Wales. [read post]
