Search for: "People v. House"
Results 981 - 1000
of 12,995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2008, 10:12 pm
The Court of Appeals has held that "[a] defendant may be convicted of depraved indifference murder when but a single person is endangered in only a few rare circumstances" (People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:45 pm
Penal Code § 9.42; see, e.g., McFadden v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Hit the button below to tell your elected officials to vote against this bill: Take action TELL congress: Defeat this bad 702 Bill Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 8:27 am
Bourgeois, and I will be providing on-site coverage of the Capitol Records v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court case, Jackson v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:46 am
” The court identifies other federal claims preempted by Section 230, including the Fair Housing Act (Chicago Lawyers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
How dumb can some people be? [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Conclusion This decision establishes that it is unlawful for disabled people moving from supported or temporary accommodation to lose transitional protection simply because their housing costs start being paid by UC. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
The first is Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd: a company dedicated to support of the rights of the Palestinian people and opposing racism. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:54 am
In a recent case called Madden v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
In Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm
I suspect they will be preoccupying quite a few people for a while. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
Case citation: Wexler v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 4:25 pm
Bank of New York Trust Co. v. [read post]
