Search for: "Royal v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by Kevin
Instead, they called supervisors and also the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who took the driver into custody. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Sarah Freuden, Alex Zerden
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010) (Kiobel I), affʹd on other grounds, Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am by INFORRM
“A Question of Trust”; and the report of the Royal United Services Institute: “A Democratic Licence to Operate”. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
Pant advised the State to stop taking criticism of governance as a personal insult. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
At the end of October, as part of the China state visit to the UK, the China-Britain Business Council and British Chamber of Commerce in China hosted the third UK-China Intellectual Property Symposium at The Royal Society. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:44 pm by Richard Primus
  And then he noted that the People of the United States decisively broke from this tradition when they became independent and designed the Constitution. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm by Matthew David Brozik
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
In March 2005 a State requested that the appellant’s name be added to the Consolidated List. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The group had targeted 1,600 high profile targets, including members of the Saudi royal family, Israeli nuclear scientists, NATO officials, and Iranian dissidents. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:03 am by Zack Bluestone
” Further pacifying Sino-Aussie relations, Canberra followed through on a previously scheduled confidence-building exercise between the Royal Australian Navy and the PLA Navy. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On October 27, 2015, as previously stated, Bill 132 was introduced. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:01 am by Eric Turkewitz
 In poker terms, the law bloggers are holding a royal flush and you don’t even have a measly pair of twos. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The Keynote speech [pdf] by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, John Whittingdale MP. [read post]