Search for: "Russell v. May" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
“An Illinois court of competent jurisdiction in a proceeding for declaration of invalidity of marriage, legal separation, or dissolution of marriage that provides for support or the distribution of property, or any proceeding to amend or enforce such support or property distribution, may order that all or any part of any (i) member’s retirement benefit, (ii) member’s refund payable to or on behalf of the member, or (iii) death benefit, or portion thereof, that would… [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
The case concerns allegations of war crimes by Mr Russell while on tour in Afghanistan. [read post]
  If you, or someone you know, is suffering from severe mental health trauma and remains unable to return to work, suggest they contact the Law Offices of Russell J. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
” At the Bill of Health Blog, Greg Lipper discusses Zubik v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  The defence case is expected to last until May 2014. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
  While each award must be made with reference to the particular circumstances and facts of the case, other cases may serve as guides to assist the court in arriving at an award that is just and fair to both parties: Kuskis at ¶136. [50] Russell J. discussed this process in Hoang v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 1:45 pm
The AP has this article on the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Bowles v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]