Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2009, 11:12 pm
And, as is apparent in a recent decision by EDNY Judge Garaufis in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
The most famous example is probably Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am
Lyle Denniston provides a general overview of United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm
She was named Director of the Human Trafficking Unit at the State Attorney's Office. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am
Department of State’s Nov. 17 filing in Cengiz et al v. bin Salman et al stating that the department recognizes Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s sovereign immunity as a sitting head of state. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
The antitrust agencies have challenged consummated deals valued as low as $3 million (see George’s/Tysons, Complaint, United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm
Scott R. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:13 am
Scott v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
Andre and Scott K. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Scott. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 17 (1933), under state or local law. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Kristy Parker, Justin Florence, Genevieve Nadeau, Soren Dayton, and Scott Welder argued that two cases to be heard soon by the Supreme Court, Biden v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
