Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 981 - 1000
of 4,543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
In July 2019, LSAC released a new process for administering a writing sample, separate from the main multiple-choice component of the exam. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum… [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 1:34 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
See State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am
That was the case about whether the police could take a blood sample from a drunk driver without a warrant, and the Supreme Court said no. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
The CJEU in its decision (according to IPKAT and the Press Release) has stated that the reproduction of a sound sample by a user even if a very short clip must be regarded as a reproduction in principle “in part” and falls in the realm of the exclusive ownership of the phonogram producer. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:22 pm
In Marchand v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:01 am
” Cotto v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
Review and clarification by high court sorely needed [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus and Patrick Moran on Cato amicus brief in Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:51 am
A ruling from June 2019, Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In Rehaif v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Irvin v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:38 am
Here, the relevant evaluation related to the percentage of individual glycans within an antibody sample, and there existed two different machines that the skilled person could use for the analysis. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm
Earlier this month, in The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:00 pm
Monster Energy Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
