Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 3:54 am by Chris Neumeyer
Montgomery Ward, the court found U.S. sales despite delivery in Hong Kong, because the supplier manufactured the goods with North American electrical fittings, affixed U.S. trademarks on the goods, and stated U.S. destinations on the invoices. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 10:26 am
Supreme Court: On 10/1/08, petitions for writ of certiorari were granted in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Consequently, his state law wage claim also failed as a matter of law (Lawson v. [read post]
Thereafter, the statute requires the President to impose a number of sanctions relating to (i) foreign assistance, (ii) arms sales, (iii) arms sales financing, (iv) denial of U.S. credit assistance (e.g., Export-Import Bank loans) and (v) a prohibition on exports of any controlled goods. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm by Keith L. Miller
The Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit of the state of Illinois has affirmed a judgment in Estate of Stanley Cora v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:41 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The test is the result of 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am by Eric
On the trademark front, we've discussed how manufacturers are battling back against unwanted eBay sales (see Mary Kay v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm by Daniel K. McClendon
Wayfair, a case that could substantially reshape the state sales tax landscape. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A bonus plan providing for specific payouts when sales employees reached stated objectives constituted a definite offer, and an employee’s continued employment and efforts to meet sales targets was valid consideration upholding a unilateral contract, determined the Sixth Circuit in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:38 am by Kevin Kaufman
Forty-five states impose statewide sales taxes, and in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]