Search for: "Seales v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 3,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For that crime, he was convicted on state disturbing-the-peace charges. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
In the 1990s, the Church of Scientology’s generated a string of cases in the United States, colloquially known as “Scientology versus the Internet” (referring to: Religious Technology Center v Netcom (1995); Religious Technology Center v F.A.C.T.Net Inc (1995); Religious Technonlogy Center v Lerma (1995)).To understand the significance of these cases, we must go back to an earlier dispute between the Church of Scientology and a former member --… [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm by Joy Waltemath
For example, a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court invalidated such an ordinance in its 2009 decision in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will need to… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
Answer: As he did earlier this term with Frank v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The parties’ appeal briefs are currently sealed on the public e-filing docket, so we cannot share them with you. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
Third, and even more controversially, the Opinion explained in a footnote that even a sealed indictment is a no-no; the risk of a leak “take[s] an unacceptable gamble with fundamental constitutional values. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]