Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 981 - 1000
of 5,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2018, 10:05 am
After consulting with prosecutors, Coleman sought a search warrant for Thomas’ cell phone. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
Any person in Florida has a right to be free from illegal searches and seizures. [read post]
15 May 2019, 5:03 am
He moved to suppress the evidence and statements derived from the pat down leading to the seizure of the firearm and ammunition, arguing the officers lacked probable cause to search him without a warrant, that the search was not incident to arrest and he did not consent. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
United States, which held that when a police officer carries out an arrest without probable cause and without a warrant, on the basis of an erroneous entry on a sheriff's office computer listing outstanding arrest warrants, the evidence that results from the search and seizure will be admissible at the trial of the person erroneously searched. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
Then he said it was not his and he could not consent to its search and seizure. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
To be "reasonable" a search and/or seizure must be conducted (i) pursuant to a valid search warrant issued by a magistrate or (b) pursuant to an exception to the search warrant requirement, such as consent (I waive my Fourth Amendment rights) or exigent circumstances (police don't have to get a warrant, say, to break into a home if they have probable cause to believe there's a bomb inside). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
” The “reasonable grounds” requirement for a § 2703(d) order is a significantly lower standard than the “probable cause” requirement required to obtain a warrant for Fourth Amendment searches or seizures. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:57 am
Jones last term, holding that a search warrant was required for that. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
The fourth amendment to the United States constitution is part of the Bill of Rights which gives citizens of the U.S. protection against unlawful searches and seizures. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:35 am
The thrust of Dotcom’s argument against the search warrants was that they were overly broad and "authorized search and seizure of material likely to include that which was irrelevant and private. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:07 pm
The operation implicates important questions about the circumstances under which law enforcement should execute search and seizure warrants against victim premises and property. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:25 pm
(If you want more details, read my recent article Ex Ante Regulation of Computer Search and Seizure.) [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:35 am
An unauthorized subpoena to appear at a state administrative hearing to testify is not a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:50 am
Relatively recently, the United States Supreme Court ruled that warrantless blood tests violate the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
Spinnato arrested Andrews and secured the location until a search warrant could be obtained. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
EFF, along with the ACLU and the California Newspaper Publishers Association, sponsored the bill from the very beginning, recognizing how the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure is inherently tied to freedom of speech. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 7:31 am
It has long been established that the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule "'is to deter future unlawful police conduct and therefore effectuate the guarantee of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures.'" Id. at 347 (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm
" See 2 LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.6(d), at 628 (4th ed. 2004) (noting that a general reference "at the end of a list of specific items may be upheld on the theory that the language of a warrant is to be construed in light of an illustrative list of seizable items" (quotation marks and citation omitted)). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:08 am
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:58 am
That is not the case, he says, because the nature of his concern is over-seizure, not over-search. [read post]
