Search for: "Sells v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 14,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Sassower v. 975 Stewart Avenue Associates, LLC, 2009 NY Slip Op 31901(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Aug. 14, 2009), recently decided by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
At some point, Abitron began selling a competing product using the same pattern and same product names. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:00 am
., v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:23 am
Hauben v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:23 am
Hauben v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
People v McFadden Court Discusses Conviction Against the Weight of the Evidence. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:02 pm
State. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
I don't think selling keyword advertising on a person's name should constitute a publicity rights violation, but that issue has completely vexed Wisconsin judges in the Habush v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:34 am
The First Circuit offered yesterday the latest confirmation of the unstated rule in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
In a legal dispute (Aurora S.A. v. [read post]
Allegedly Infringing Sales Of Perfect Pushup Exercise Device Trigger Copyright And Trademark Lawsuit
22 Jan 2009, 12:14 am
The case is titled Perfect Pushup, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
As the current Court term churns along and conferences and arguments are conducted and orders are issued, one case from last term--Madison County v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:46 am
Her Honor therefore permanently enjoined the plaintiff “from infringing the [patent-in-suit] by manufacturing, using, importing, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, or exporting from the United States” the infringing products until the expiration of the patent-in-suit. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:05 am
The post $ 103,000.00 – L.M.S. v Travelers Insurance appeared first on Sansone, Sumner & Lauber. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
State v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:35 am
Duraflame, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
On June 28, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided McDonald v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
” By a vote of 7-2, the Court held in an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer that SLUSA does not preempt the plaintiffs’ state-law class actions, noting that “plaintiffs do not allege that the defendants’ misrepresentations led anyone to buy or to sell (or to maintain positions in)covered securities. [read post]
