Search for: "Sharpe v. Sharpe"
Results 981 - 1000
of 4,119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Sharpe (1954) Williamson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:16 pm
The case of Sweeting v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:02 am
Sharp v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 3:14 pm
Additional Resources: King v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Tillis's efforts to distance himself from (at least) the proposed overruling of the eBay v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:09 am
Three Dusseldorf trials have yet to be scheduled.Foxconn-owned Sharp, which announced a new license deal with Samsung last week, has filed (at least) five patent infringement complaints against Daimler: three in Munich and two in Mannheim.Today the press office of the Munich I Regional Court ("Landgericht München I") thankfully responded to my inquiry regarding the hearing dates in the three Munich Sharp v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
” At Reason, Damon Root previews the Supreme Court’s next big Fourth Amendment case, Kansas v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:35 am
A recent case before the Human Rights Committee, Portillo Caceres v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
Murphy (now Sharp v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
The government shutdown not only affected federal workers but it made it hard to keep the cooks and waiters busy at the Bickering Sisters Café just down the street from the James V. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:58 am
Warren and Sanders to retire the metaphor of the financial sector as vampires or “vultures” engaged in “sucking” or “bleeding” [Ira Stoll, related] Volume of securities litigation is on sharp upswing, policy remedies needed [Kevin LaCroix/D&O Diary and more, Chubb “Rising Tide” report] Rising in Australia too [Nicola Middlemiss, Insurance Business Australia] Unconstitutionality of CFPB structure hasn’t gone away and neither has… [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am
See Orion Tire Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Decisions come down sooner only if a case is easily dismissed, and they take longer only under special circumstances such as when there are doubts over the validity of a patent and some guidance from the EPO (in an opposition proceeding) or the Federal Patent Court of Germany is expected in the meantime.Three more German cases are pending with the Dusseldorf Regional Court, but no trials have been scheduled yet in any of them:case no. 4c O 17/19 over EP2087629 on "a method of transmitting data… [read post]
