Search for: "Short v. West" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In short, the court concluded that the FDA would never view the relevant regulations in the same way that the plaintiff in Kemp had twisted them in search of something to call a violation.By misconstruing FDA requirements, the violation claims in Kemp in reality would have imposed requirements that differed from those of the FDA. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Cyber Lawyer
Other cases holding similarly include multiple West Virginia cases (see, for example, Patrick Collins, Case No. 3:10-cv-00091, *3; Third World Media, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
When last we checked in on the saga of Dr. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 10:38 am by Deborah A. Sivas
  Indeed, if Loper Bright and other recent precedent-altering decisions like West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
The controversy concerning a large outdoor artwork in Katoomba (in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney) highlights the difficulties faced by indigenous communities when it comes to safeguarding their cultural heritage. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Ward
Corp., 933 N.E.2d 721, 892 N.Y.S.2d 8 (2010), and the New Jersey Supreme Court in Gallenthin v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
There are no great issues of law on this application for a Rent Repayment order for an unlicensed HMO (though it was decided before Rakusen v Jepson in the Court of Appeal, which might have made a small difference), but it is entertaining not only for the attempted subterfuge but the approach of the property owner, Ms Cabo: Ms Cabo stated during the hearing that she did not want to know about property law, however we do not consider that this constitutes a reasonable excuse In… [read post]
13 May 2022, 3:41 am by SHG
On the one hand, the bill wasn’t intended to “preserve rights established by Roe v. [read post]