Search for: "Singer v. Singer" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon)   Europe L’Oréal v eBay: a warning to online marketplace operators (JIPLP)   Germany Apple v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action “exists where a party to a contract receives bills or invoices and does not protest within a reasonable time” (Russo v Heller, 80 AD3d 531, 532 (1st Dept 2011] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), or where partial payment has been made (see Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
Turkey (8 June 2010) which concerned the seizure of a book about “stardom” and a particular pop singer who had complained about the book which partly reproduced the author’s a doctoral thesis. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Singer Arianna Grande is suing Forever 21 and Riley Rose for use of her likeness, IP Harbour comments. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Mr Clarkson denied the affair but in October 2010 obtained an injunction to restrain the publication of purported private information: AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 11:16 am by Scott Alan Burroughs
The Second Circuit recognized this in Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They went on to distinguish expected/accepted copying v. offensive copying. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:13 pm
This view was first adapted by the Supreme Court in NTPC v Singer, AIR 1993 SC 998 and was espoused by the Bombay and Delhi High Courts in Frontier Drilling A.S and DGS Realtors. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  The oral argument thus renewed the mystery of why the Court granted certiorari in the first place--especially after it had denied the petition in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Vernon Petroleum Corp. v Singer Holding Corp., 103 AD3d 623 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]