Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Usually, the use of classified information in a federal criminal case is not a problem for prosecutors. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:19 pm
Some Other Day Please: Motion to Continue While Judge Strickland granted the State’s Motion for Determination of New Trial Date, it must be realized that his order only instructed the Clerk to docket the Check Fraud case for “pretrial and trial” – a standard couplet of court dates that are scheduled in all criminal cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:39 am
It said standard jury instructions for the crime at the time he was charged made clear that prosecutors had to prove that he threatened to use the gun in order to be convicted. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
THE Scottish Legal Aid Board’s FAILURE to provide legal aid in the case of a criminal case contributed to the collapse of yet another criminal prosecution, as Sheriff Nigel Morrison QC dismissed charges against an accused of breaking curfew conditions in an antisocial behaviour order (ASBO), because of the lack of legal aid provision for the accused's solicitor to defend the charges properly. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
THE Scottish Legal Aid Board’s FAILURE to provide legal aid in the case of a criminal case contributed to the collapse of yet another criminal prosecution, as Sheriff Nigel Morrison QC dismissed charges against an accused of breaking curfew conditions in an antisocial behaviour order (ASBO), because of the lack of legal aid provision for the accused's solicitor to defend the charges properly. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court's professed faith in the power of limiting instructions, see, e.g., Samia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
Garcia instructed the defendant to drive around, and during that time the defendant observed Garcia `make the drop. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Jury selection in death penalty cases is a time-consuming and costly undertaking. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:14 pm
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Few, if any, courts instruct juries on the pitfalls of eyewitness identification or caution them to be skeptical of eyewitness testimony. 2. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:56 pm
Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction 5.01 states that, "A person is reckless when he consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk . . ., and such disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care which a reasonable person would exercise in the situation. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
” The Supreme Court reversed, ruling that Elonis’s jury had been improperly instructed. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:55 pm
Appellate courts do not like to be rushed, especially in high profile cases. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
A recent case, State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
The Second Circuit agreed with Newman and Chiasson, concluding that the jury instructions were improper and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Typical reasons for reversing your conviction or judgment may include: 1) Your conviction was "against the weight of the evidence" introduced at trial; 2) The trial court allowed inadmissible or improper evidence to be used against you; 3) The trial court gave improper jury instructions; 4) The trial judge or prosecutor committed some kind of impropriety; and 5) Juror/Jury bias or irregularity. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:25 pm
In a criminal case, the burden on the prosecutor is to establish the defendant's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, a much stricter standard. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:43 am
He compared the subjective nature of the standard to defendants claiming "self defense" as an affirmative defense in a murder case. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Magg's Inc., PICS Case No. 09-1822 (C.P. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm
Groups advocating for domestic violence victims joined the case seeking review from the California Supreme Court, arguing the current standard "eliminates accountability for abusers who claim provocation. [read post]
