Search for: "Stanley v. Stanley" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm by Gregory Forman
 In order to support a finding of contempt for violation of a court order, “[t]he language of the commands must be clear and certain rather than implied” Welchel v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:13 am by Daniel Hemli
(Morgan Stanley), claiming damages for antitrust violations resulting from an allegedly illegal swap agreement that allowed KeySpan to manipulate energy prices in the New York City electric generating capacity market (NYC Capacity Market), see Konefsky et al. v. [...] [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am by tracey
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936;  [2011] WLR (D)  385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 8:12 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A record or statement of a public office if: (A) it sets out: (i) the office’s activities; (ii) a matter observed while under a legal duty... [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 3:24 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
Bruce Einhorn, David Fraser, Sam Garkawe, Stanley A. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:29 am by Francis Davey
In the Summer Dave and David Smith posted about the case of Kinnear v Whittaker in the High Court. [read post]