Search for: "State v. Bail" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Charles Rowland
Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, but it is widely accepted that governments have the right to detain through trial a defendant of a serious crime who is a flight risk or poses a danger to the public. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
On the other hand, on behalf of the respondent, State of West Bengal, in opposition to that plea, reliance was placed on a later decision of this Court in Akbar Sheikh and others v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
State of Haryana and another [(2003) 4 SCC 675], Nikhil Merchant v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:21 am
In the March 14 ruling Romspen Investment Corp. v. 6176666 Canada Ltée., Brown unleashed his frustration regarding the lack of technology in Ontario courts. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
The Texas Attorney General’s announcement that the state will appeal a voter ID decision in Texas v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:26 am by Rumpole
, then surely we wouldn't have the decision in Hall v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:39 pm by Kevin
  But with Juror #4 on her way to Mexico, that left the question of what to do with the case of State v. [read post]