Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 981 - 1000
of 4,559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Berts v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Drugged Out: How Cognitive Bias Hurts Drug Innovation," Cynthia Ho, Clifford E. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
Specifically, the Supreme Court should: (1) overturn Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 8:06 am
In Ansley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
Well, there are a couple of prior Ninth Circuit cases that fairly clearly state that in such an event, you remand with instructions to adjudicate the petition on the assumption that the petitioner is credible; for example, a 1994 case called Guo, which stated: "Where an appellate court has heldthat an IJ's or BIA's adverse credibility finding is not supported by substantial evidence . . . the proper procedure is to remand the case to the BIA for… [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Assn. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175, 186; Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Assn. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175, 186; Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Ryan and Trevino v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:35 pm
This decision was made in the shadow of Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 2:26 pm
This week the Ontario Court of Appeal released a much awaited decision in the case of Westerhof v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:23 pm
State Farm] Booster clubs: “Does Title IX Reach Voluntary Donations? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
It may be my bias, but it strikes me as barbaric. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
The Court here distinguished Nikula v Finland on these grounds. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
") AC29684 - State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:18 pm
In International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 8:22 am
Dec. 441 (BIA 2018), and the only other court of appeals to reach this issue, see Hernandez-Perez v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
SWP erred by not taking reasonable steps to make enquiries about whether the AFR Locate software had bias on racial or sex grounds. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:54 pm
Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 131 provides a recent example of the ‘pro-enforcement bias’ of at least some Australian courts when it comes to international arbitration awards. [read post]
