Search for: "State v. Call"
Results 981 - 1000
of 54,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
The Appeals Court said, "Having reviewed the dismissal de novo, assuming that the facts stated in the complaint are true, Lambeth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:05 am
Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
" State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Recorded phone call between party and copyright agent regarding image timing confidential at prelitigation phase Nature of Case: copyright dispute Electronic Data Involved: phone call recording Keywords: protective order, confidential phone call, work-product Identified State Rule(s): FRBC Rule 4-4.1, 4-1.2 Identified Federal Rule(s): 26(b)(3), 37(a)(5) View Case Opinion [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:57 am
June 25, 2015 On June 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of King, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 7:34 pm
When called to testify, N.S. stated that she wished to wear a niqab which covered her face, and which she insisted was a necessary part of her Muslim faith. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
She began yelling about a mistake with the withholding in her paycheck, she swore, she pounded her fist, and called the employees “terrible. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Stepp v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:28 am
Colvin, February 9, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Weiss & Assocs v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:24 am
Constitution (Matal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
Williams v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
