Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 981 - 1000
of 14,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 6:16 pm
This was apparently influenced as well by a recent New York State Appellate Division ruling in Hoffman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
–Cross v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:59 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18631 - State v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 9:25 am
The situation is similar in other border states. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:37 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under... [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:59 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides that A statement is not hearsay if...The declarant testifies at trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is... [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:50 pm
In Edwin Cheek v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 2:26 pm
State. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:56 pm
Hettena v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:53 am
SIPC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
There was, however, no cross-examination of the Secretary of State’s key witness. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
Kathy Joan Copas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:35 am
(Note, for example, just from yesterday, State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm
The decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
La Crosse Tech., Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:56 am
In Davis v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:13 am
Last summer, the need to further turn our attention to the states was thrown into sharp relief following the Supreme Court’s egregious decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
