Search for: "State v. Deans" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
 The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen notes that in Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:24 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The Appeal Court failed to draw a distinction between the threat from other prisoners, and the conduct for which the state was responsible, whereas the correct legal test when the threat comes from the acts of third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:41 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the court vacated in part the decision of the court below dismissing the plaintiff’s retaliation claim (Irrera v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Advocate (representing the Taiwanese Judicial Authorities & Anor) v Dean (Scotland), heard on 6 Mar 2017. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm by Bill Otis
 See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Advocate (representing the Taiwanese Judicial Authorities & Anor) v Dean (Scotland), heard on 6 Mar 2017. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:44 am by Mark Walsh
“I will not try to defend particular aspects of the chief justice’s work,” Sexton said, though he did point to Burger’s “signature moment” — the court’s unanimous 1974 decision, with an opinion written by Burger, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, about forfeiture in certain drug crimes, and Kokesh v. [read post]