Search for: "State v. Denny"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 10:09 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Paul Winters v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
by Dennis Crouch The pending case of Jump Rope Systems v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
” Comm v James Dennis, 2011 Pa. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
by Dennis Crouch Almirall, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:41 pm
Dennis will be there as well. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
You can read Dennis’s write-up here. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:24 pm
V. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Ultramercial v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:27 am
by Dennis Crouch Tormasi v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:54 am
— Dennis by Logan Moore I. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:00 am
See also, Celgard, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:18 am
by Dennis Crouch US Inventor Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am
Advocates argue that Congress didn’t really end Indian reservation status for much of the state of Oklahoma even if everyone at the time thought it did [Will Baude on Sharp v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:05 am
Section 12: Overrules eBay v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:10 pm
by Dennis Crouch Edible IP v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:06 am
by Dennis Crouch Valve Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
Unlike many of those other legislators, however, Kruse seems to be aware that legal precedent, in the form of Edwards v. [read post]
