Search for: "State v. Gathers" Results 981 - 1000 of 5,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Jeffrey Krivis
“We are gathered here today to join these two parties in holy matrimony. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal added a third  reason: “In my view, it can also be said that the gathering of information through proprietary web crawler software (“Googlebot”) takes place in British Columbia. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:26 pm
  The case (available here) is US v. [read post]
Several national decisions, as well as the UPC CoA decision in Nanostring v 10x Genomics were cited. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 10:17 am by INFORRM
Print v digital The downward trend in print circulation that all publishers are battling has gathered pace in the past decade. [read post]