Search for: "State v. Griffin" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
National Trial Competition // Syracuse University School of Law (January 30-31, 2015) Coach: Joel Seidemann Team Members: Luis Felix (3L), Joseph Fortunato (3L), Kenyon Griffin (3L), Matt Reno (3L) The competition involved a case of People of the State of Lone Star v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Professor Hamilton blogs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Green card holders live in the United States as our neighbors and serve in our Armed Forces. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
   In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
  For example, in human rights law, a violation will occur where there has been a failure of state protection.[6] Thus, it makes no sense to speak of a human rights violation and a failure of state protection.[7] And even if a human rights violation is taken to be demonstrative of a failure of state protection (which is true in human rights discourse), the Refugee Convention speaks of a state’s inability or unwillingness to protect an applicant. [read post]