Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 981 - 1000
of 8,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
Price v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:39 am
Intel still filed an amicus brief in FTC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
” An NPR article on Guinn v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 5:03 pm
A debt collector would not be liable if the letter either (i) “accurately informs the consumer that the amount of the debt stated in the letter will increase over time,” or (ii) “clearly states that the holder of the debt will accept payment in the amount set forth in full satisfaction of the debt if payment is made by a specified date. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am
Germany is the world's most popular patent litigation venue, and last week's legislative decision does nothing to dissuade patent holders from enforcing their intellectual property rights in the largest EU member state. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
SEP injunction case law, however, has gotten out of hand with the two Sisvel v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:40 am
In Cortez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:40 am
Intel patent trial in the Western District of Texas is still the record holder. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm
” The court ruled in favor of the government and rejected Sanchez and Gonzalez’s claim that the TPS statute included a provision making TPS holders eligible for adjustment of status, under Section 1254a(f)(4). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
The court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:13 am
Rajesh Bansal and Koninklijke Philips v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
In Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 5:29 am
ZTE guidance after the Federal Court of Justice of Germany vitiated the ECJ case law in two Sisvel v. [read post]
