Search for: "State v. Jim " Results 981 - 1000 of 2,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
 James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Some interesting items have crossed my desk on Friday and Saturday: From the Grand Theft: Property blog, Jim Mattson posts his thoughts about Monks v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
  Back in 1999, when the Ohio Supremes affirmed his death sentence in State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:09 am by Mark Tabakman
 The subcontractor, Jim’s Maintenance, contended that the indemnification provision was facially illegal as it was void under the public policy of the State of Minnesota (the state that the parties agreed contractually controlled the claim). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:23 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, a mere twelve years after the Supreme Court sanctioned racial segregation in public facilities in Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I once got in an argument with a group over whether or not some states still executed prisoners by firing squad. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm by Berin Szoka
My dear friend, fellow space/IT/priavcy/communications lawyer and now PFF Adjunct Fellow Jim Dunstan just published this PFF paper, which I thought I’d share with you (PDF) ______________________ The FCC’s Title II “Lite” (as a Lead Balloon!) [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:32 pm
He handles Criminal Defense cases including DWI.Given that this stands no chance of ever remaining law (Lawyers have a right to advertise Bates v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
At the National Review Online, Scott Gaylord discusses last week’s order in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]