Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 8:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ministry of Defence v Cartner [2011] EWCA Civ 1516 (08 December 2011) Country Style Foods Ltd v Bouzir [2011] EWCA Civ 1519 (08 December 2011) Cusack v London Borough of Harrow [2011] EWCA Civ 1514 (07 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) MO, & Ors, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2854 (08 December 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Bates, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
More significantly, member states would risk breaching of their obligations under the international instruments cited. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The first is Secretary of State for Health and Ors v Servier Laboratories and Ors. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 1:50 am
Lord Wilson gave the leading judgment, with which Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson agreed. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
In their explanatory blog post, the NRP draws parallels to the famous 1772 case of Somerset v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
In addition, the applicant relied on the judgment in Lord Janner v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2015] EWHC 2578 (Admin) in which the Divisional Court found that the Magistrates’ Court had no power to send a defendant for trial under section 51 CDA 1998 if they are not present in the courtroom. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
It is unlikely that Lord Justice Leveson would be impressed. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
” So claimed Lord Pearce in Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am
Lord Hamblen and Lady Rose dissent. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
But if in fact the instructions issued in Georgia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
” The Judge also stated that “Here, as elsewhere, context is everything” and this focus on context and circumstances was approved by Lord Bingham in the House of Lords. [read post]
