Search for: "State v. Murphy"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:45 pm
While federal district court decisions are not binding on state courts or on the Ninth Circuit, the growing acceptance of the reasoning in White v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Michael Murphy analyzes the oral argument in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 6:24 pm
In Lindquist v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
" (Murphy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Moreover, the claims were not barred by the statute of limitations, which was tolled by both executive order (9 NYCRR 8.202.8), as extended, and the continuous representation doctrine (Murphy v Harris, 210 AD3d 410, 411 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
In 2000 they came very close when they agreed to hear an appeal from the 11th Circuit's Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court's 1996 Romer v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
The Court just last Term, in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Judge Murphy got reversed on a downward departure in Berry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
Murphy, a capital case in which the justices are considering whether Congress has disestablished the boundaries of an Indian reservation in Oklahoma, affecting the state’s ability to prosecute crimes in the affected area. [read post]
Slants win Trademark Rights Suit On First Amendment Grounds Despite Using Racial Slur as a Trademark
13 Aug 2017, 2:37 pm
Supreme Court had given its ruling on Matal v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Another Year, Another Attempt in Congress to Ban Non-Competes Nationwide Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) introduced legislation in 2019 entitled the Workforce Mobility Act (“WMA”). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Press v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:01 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
Defendants include Jack Murphy, a state senator. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am
That argument was unsuccessful in the state courts, but when Murphy went to federal court, the U.S. [read post]
