Search for: "State v. Murphy"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 12:45 pm
While federal district court decisions are not binding on state courts or on the Ninth Circuit, the growing acceptance of the reasoning in White v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 1:00 pm
I didn't check the state database. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
In 2000 they came very close when they agreed to hear an appeal from the 11th Circuit's Murphy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
The Court just last Term, in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
” Murphy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
” Murphy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Michael Murphy analyzes the oral argument in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
" (Murphy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Press v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Judge Murphy got reversed on a downward departure in Berry v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:01 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am
That argument was unsuccessful in the state courts, but when Murphy went to federal court, the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Moreover, the claims were not barred by the statute of limitations, which was tolled by both executive order (9 NYCRR 8.202.8), as extended, and the continuous representation doctrine (Murphy v Harris, 210 AD3d 410, 411 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
