Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Graeme Dinwoodie, University of Oxford, Oxford Taco Cabana wouldn’t have come out the same way in 2000. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
Villata, Professor at the University of Milan: Louise MERRETT, Employment Contracts in Private International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2nd ed., 2022) pp. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2012 xviii, 335 p. ; 25 cm. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court watchers could be forgiven if last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Cathleen KavenyLinda McClain’s book is a meticulously researched and compellingly presented study of moral and political language. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Chapter V explores sports issues in private litigation, including standing, class actions, injunctions, and damages. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
Their book, “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” will be published by Oxford University Press in September. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
As I shall explain in this column, last week’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
Accredited journalists in attendance at financial remedy hearings held in private are collaterally bound by that undertaking: Appleton v Gallagher, above, at [10]. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Noel Canning, and use the original meaning as a regulative ideal doctrinally, as in Free Enterprise v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am
Elliot's argument largely states, and what the court had to assess, was whether the term 'Google' had effectively become ubiquitous with the verb 'googling' - defined by the Oxford Dictionary as "[s]earch[ing] for information about (someone or something) on the Internet using the search engine Google" - rendering it generic rather than distinctive as to Google and/or Google's services. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Andrew, 961 So. 2d 375, 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
’ / Charles Wheeler Award, University of Westminster, London. 12 June 2012, all day: The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ and Beyond: Data Protection and Freedom of Expression in the Age of Web 2.0, Oxford Privacy Information Law and Society, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford University. 15 June 2012, 11am-17.30pm, Terrorism & Security Research in the UK: Using and Understanding Legal Resources, organised by Law, Terrorism and the Right to Know Project at the… [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
