Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Opposition is growing over State Government plans to extend defamation laws. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:25 am by Antonio Zuccaro
Pavlos Eleftheriadis (University of Oxford)SESSION III (Chair: Maksymilian Del Mar)Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:09 am by Jeremy
Fellow 1709er Eleonora is far too modest to mention it, but she has just had a Current Intelligence note published online in the Oxford University Press publication, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice (JECLAP). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:40 am
(Photo by Zofia Smardz/The Washington Post) It’s in Justice Scalia’s opinion this morning in Whitfield v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court recently granted review in Walker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by Wells Bennett
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Jianlin Chen, Deconstructing the Religious Free Market, (3 Journal of Law, Religion and State 1-24 (2014)).Russell G. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 4:33 pm
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) at para. 9.03:The doctrine of fraud on a power is not founded upon a state of conscience imputed to the donee in equity. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am by Jani
Elliot's argument largely states, and what the court had to assess, was whether the term 'Google' had effectively become ubiquitous with the verb 'googling' - defined by the Oxford Dictionary as "[s]earch[ing] for information about (someone or something) on the Internet using the search engine Google" - rendering it generic rather than distinctive as to Google and/or Google's services. [read post]